<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why Linking Out is a Bobby Jindal No-Brainer</title> <atom:link href="http://www.directom.com/internet-marketing-blog/why-linking-out-is-a-bobby-jindal-no-brainer_430.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.directom.com/internet-marketing-blog/why-linking-out-is-a-bobby-jindal-no-brainer_430.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" /> <item><title>By: Paul Woodhouse</title><link>http://www.directom.com/internet-marketing-blog/why-linking-out-is-a-bobby-jindal-no-brainer_430.html#comment-289</link> <dc:creator>Paul Woodhouse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:56:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.directom.com/internet-marketing-blog/?p=430#comment-289</guid> <description>I&#039;m talking about those sites that still won&#039;t link out when an external link is justified - and there are quite a few that are trying to hoard and store their link juice for a rainy day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s those who think linking out is bad practice who had this idea validated with the onset of the nofollow tag.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m referring more to an iPhone application where they&#039;ll link to their internal iPhone category page as opposed to the application itself. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve no qualms at all with linking internally. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I think your little solution (which sounds a bit like the way Techcrunch approach it) makes quite a bit of sense.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For me it&#039;s perfect common sense: link to anything that provides context or attribution. &lt;br /&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m talking about those sites that still won&#8217;t link out when an external link is justified &#8211; and there are quite a few that are trying to hoard and store their link juice for a rainy day.</p><p>It&#8217;s those who think linking out is bad practice who had this idea validated with the onset of the nofollow tag.</p><p>I&#8217;m referring more to an iPhone application where they&#8217;ll link to their internal iPhone category page as opposed to the application itself.</p><p>I&#8217;ve no qualms at all with linking internally.</p><p>But I think your little solution (which sounds a bit like the way Techcrunch approach it) makes quite a bit of sense.</p><p>For me it&#8217;s perfect common sense: link to anything that provides context or attribution.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bentz</title><link>http://www.directom.com/internet-marketing-blog/why-linking-out-is-a-bobby-jindal-no-brainer_430.html#comment-288</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bentz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:32:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.directom.com/internet-marketing-blog/?p=430#comment-288</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think that most people have a problem linking out when the external link is justified. That said, if a site provides extensive coverage on a subject like the iPhone, why not throw internal links to a category page about the iPhone? After all, a site visitor is already there to read your information. Not all visitors want to be taken to a purchase page or another site to buy, am I right?Maybe the solution is keyword-centric internal linking with a url for more information at the bottom?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that most people have a problem linking out when the external link is justified. That said, if a site provides extensive coverage on a subject like the iPhone, why not throw internal links to a category page about the iPhone? After all, a site visitor is already there to read your information. Not all visitors want to be taken to a purchase page or another site to buy, am I right?Maybe the solution is keyword-centric internal linking with a url for more information at the bottom?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul Woodhouse</title><link>http://www.directom.com/internet-marketing-blog/why-linking-out-is-a-bobby-jindal-no-brainer_430.html#comment-290</link> <dc:creator>Paul Woodhouse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:37:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.directom.com/internet-marketing-blog/?p=430#comment-290</guid> <description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Post: Why Linking Out is a Bobby Jindal No-Brainer http://twurl.nl/wnfxsq&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span
class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span
class="topsy_twitter_username"><span
class="topsy_trackback_content">Post: Why Linking Out is a Bobby Jindal No-Brainer <a
href="http://twurl.nl/wnfxsq" rel="nofollow">http://twurl.nl/wnfxsq</a></span></span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
